Living with Less: How Much Stuff Does a Family Need?
Last spring, at the height of weekend garage sale season, my older boy asked me, “Mom, do people all over the world have garage sales?”
How I answered will be revealed at the end of this post. But I thought about our conversation after reading this opinion piece in the Sunday New York Times, about why we all have so much stuff and what we can do about it. It’s by a serial Internet entrepreneur named Graham Hill who realized, when a series of life changes first compelled him to buy and fill up a 3,600-square-foot Seattle house and, then, a 1,900-square-foot downtown Manhattan loft, then drain these homes in order to travel, that he had a troublesome relationship with stuff. What he found was that gathering and then dealing with all the stuff never felt right, whereas once he left behind or got rid of the furniture and gadgets and tools and sundries, he felt lighter, and not just because he could fit his life in a backpack (or, now, into a 420-square-foot studio). He realized that all the stuff he’d owned, far from making him more fulfilled, dragged him down emotionally.
I hate stuff. I mean, I love stuff, but I hate having to deal with it. I suspect as a parent I’m not alone here — toys, outgrown clothes, video games, toys, books, and did I mention toys? There’s a push-pull: I don’t have a very spacious house, so I find myself alternately wishing I had more room, bigger rooms, more capacious closets; and wishing that I could downsize to that just-right point in which the four of us, and the stuff we actually use and need, fit comfortably right where we are.
My mother, a.k.a. the Original Mean Mom, has the same split-screen approach I do (though she’s just that one or two notches better than I am at organizing, or perhaps she’s just more ruthless than I am): She likes stuff, she buys things (clothes, kitchen items, the small antique tables she has a strange affinity for), but she also gets rid of things, and does not live in a large space anymore.
Which brings me to the house in which I grew up. When I compare the four-bed Colonial I spent most of my childhood in to the house in which I’m raising my boys, I remember our old home as far more commodious.
Then I went back and looked at it. This was about a year ago — my older son and I were driving through the town in which I grew up, and I took an impulsive detour to our old street — a leafy cul-de-sac with 11 identical homes, built in 1968. I had not been in the house since the day my folks moved out, in 1996. Again on impulse, I rang the doorbell. The owners — fortunately for me, the same family who’d bought it from my parents — remembered the name and agreed to let me in to look around. (“Just excuse how it looks,” the woman of the house said, “I don’t keep house like your mom did.” Ha. It looked fine. I replied, truthfully, “Don’t worry. No one keeps house like my mom does.”)
Some things surprised me, such as the fact that the wallpaper my dad had put up in the stairwell and upstairs hall was still there, and as outdated as it was the day they moved out. Some amazed me, like how awesome the kitchen looked, having been relatively recently renovated and opened up to the dining room. I felt emotional (naturally), but also baffled. This was my house? I mean, it’s nice and comfy and easy to move around in, sure. But it’s not big, at least not by today’s open-concept, walk-in-closet, great-room, double-vanity standards, anyway. My old room, my sanctuary, felt boxy, the closet shallow (though the shelves my dad and I had built when I was 11 or so were still there, and still covered with the blue and white Contact paper I had picked out). The den was comfy, but — sensing a theme? — small.
How did we live there?
Very well, actually, the same way my family and I live here in our little domicile.
In his Times piece, Hill shares this tidbit:
In a study published last year titled “Life at Home in the Twenty-First Century,” researchers at U.C.L.A. observed 32 middle-class Los Angeles families and found that all of the mothers’ stress hormones spiked during the time they spent dealing with their belongings. Seventy-five percent of the families involved in the study couldn’t park their cars in their garages because they were too jammed with things.
It shouldn’t surprise any of us that square footage of the average American home has gone up steadily over the years. My home, built in 1950 and expanded by a previous owner some time in the 1990s (I think) is about 1,800 square feet. That’s miniscule by today’s new-home standard, with the average in 2011 about 2,480. And that’s with fewer people in each home, for the most part. (Of the 11 original owners on our old street, only one family had two kids. All the rest were three-, four- or five-kid families.) I just watched an episode of House Hunters International last night, in which a nice Tennessee family, a husband and wife and two tween sons, moved to Dusseldorf, Germany for a job transfer. They left a bigger-than-4,000-square-foot home. All that space for four people! And though I don’t know this for sure, I can make a good guess that every closet was full, plus the (three-car) garage and basement. With what? (The heartening news is that they downsized in their new German home, a still-roomy but much more compact city apartment, which I cheered them for choosing.)
I still wouldn’t mind more space. Or maybe more logically laid out space (the part where the former owners expanded in the 80s? Gee, but I wish they’d consulted me on what they did!) But frankly I’d rather just get rid of more of what we have. As I type this, half my unfinished basement laundry room is taken up with bags and boxes and piles of stuff waiting for me to have time to cart it to Goodwill or call up one of the charities I routinely donate to.
A few months ago I took everything out of my bedroom closet, and axed more than half of the clothes in there as no longer needed. I cleaned the space, re-hung and re-organized what was left and you know what? All the air space between the clothes and shoes and bags that were left helped me breathe, almost literally. I looked at it and I felt measurably more relaxed. I was so impressed I took photos:
So back to the beginning and the answer I gave my son when he asked about garage-sale rates around the world: I had to think about it for a second, but of course the answer’s obvious. Garage sales are a uniquely Western (if not almost always American) phenomenon. I said to my boy, “Honey, if you and your family lived in a one-room hut or shack, and had just one pot for cooking, you would never feel the need to sell that pot, would you? We only get rid of stuff because we have too much of it.”
Now that I think of it, my pot closet is a daily source of annoyance and some cursing, given how unorganized it can be. I rail against the mish-mash of the cabinet, as though it was the cabinet’s fault. Nope. I just have too many pots.
How about you?
Jennifer Fink
March 13, 2013 @ 2:33 pm
The whole trend toward bigger houses while we have smaller families (and both parents work outside the house) has baffled me for some time. I’d rather have a smaller, older house and have more time together to enjoy it.
Denise Schipani
March 13, 2013 @ 3:37 pm
Seriously, Jenny! I see a soaring ceiling and I think two things: I’d have to heat all that space; and I’d have to clean it!
Sally
March 13, 2013 @ 3:07 pm
I read that same article and every time I read an article like that (I read one a few years ago about a family that sold all their belongings and went off on a boat for two years), part of me always wishes I could do that – or some perhaps less drastic version of that. I am burdened by my stuff. My husband will tell you of the time we were both struggling to lay stinky mulch around our rosebushes and all I could do from my smelly rose thorn stuck position was scream “apartment”. First world problem for sure. I don’t expect any sympathy, but I do recognize the irony of the stress caused to us by all the stuff we strive for.
Kayris
March 13, 2013 @ 3:36 pm
Closets? You have closets? I am jealous. We have two tiny closets for the entire house. Some people want bigger houses. I would be happy with a coat closet.
Kristen
March 13, 2013 @ 3:43 pm
We conciously chose a smaller house for our family of four. (1,300 above-ground square feet). It limits us to not-much-stuff …and frankly, keeps us engaged and interacting with each other.
I love small house living and don’t understand the 3,500 square foot obsession. Who needs that much space?
….Except for the mud rooms and master baths. I secretly believe that people who have mud rooms and master baths MUST have happier lives.
Cate
March 13, 2013 @ 5:48 pm
I couldn’t agree with you more – I secretly fantasize about adding a mudroom to our house. I’m pretty sure it would make my life complete.
Eileen
March 14, 2013 @ 7:55 pm
Ha! Kristen, you hit the nail on the head. If only I had that mudroom and luxurious master bath…you know, the one they show in last 5 minutes of any show on hgtv….I would be the happiest woman on earth. That is until I realized that what I really need is a bigger walk-in closet or second floor laundry room.
Denise Schipani
March 13, 2013 @ 3:45 pm
Kristen, absolutely! I would GIVE UP some of my precious square footage to turn it into a mudroom. Those are happy,happy places. Meanwhile,I’m fine sharing a sink with my husband. We’re humble like that. 😉
Denise
Renee Anne
March 13, 2013 @ 4:49 pm
When we moved to California, we knew we were going to have to downsize. I inherited two houses worth of stuff…and two houses. When we moved from my mom’s condo into my grandparents’ house, we got rid of a lot of stuff. I also had to clean out room in my grandparents’ house to make room for us. When we moved to California (from Wisconsin), we really downsized. I got rid of quite a bit of stuff (though we still had a bunch come with us. Now that we’re finally in a house, we’re having to replace furniture we got rid of (bookshelves mostly) and I’m still going through things and getting rid of things.
I think I’ve been really good about getting rid of things but there are some things I just can’t part with yet…or things that I outright refuse to part with. Some of those things take up space that we don’t always have but it’ll work itself out in the end.
Kayris
March 13, 2013 @ 5:33 pm
However….I love the yardsale concept. Too many people just throw things that still have use in them away! I just scored two very large planters and a brand new composter for my garden off free cycle!
Cate
March 13, 2013 @ 5:45 pm
I LOVED this topic! I live in a mid-century cape cod, about 1,900 square feet, with three kids. I try very hard to clean house regularly – we only keep 2 baskets of toys in the living room at a time – but where does all this crap come from?! I’ve taken to giving cash to nieces and nephews for Christmas and birthdays, hoping they will save it and not just buy more crap. I’m also hoping, someday, their parents will return the favor. The previous owners of our house also ‘renovated’ adding about 600 square feet of master bedroom (which now houses a playpen, a pack n’ play, and a cradle in addition to our bedroom furniture). They also ‘renovated’ the kitchen, which now only has ONE drawer! Pretty sure the 1950s kitchen had more than one drawer!
Mel Bowman
March 13, 2013 @ 8:07 pm
We’re currently in the process of finalizing our house plan – a dream of ours since my husband and I first met 10 years ago. 1500sq ft for our family of 3, with two 12×12 bedrooms, 1.5 baths, and a large, open living, dining, and kitchen. People are constantly shocked that our bedrooms are so small and that there is no master suite.
We’ve been advised to build bigger, but I have no intention to: why go through the added trouble and expense if not to get exactly what you want (for better or worse)? Finishing off the basement in the future will gain us our extra guest bedroom, another bathroom, and party space – more than enough room for 3 people.
Martha
March 14, 2013 @ 2:55 am
Love these comments – we live in 1600 sq ft with our soon to be three kids and being pregnant has sent me on a ridiculous cleaning/nesting spree. Of course, I’m planning a garage sale and hauling boxes to donate routinely. I’m determined not to get swallowed up by new stuff just as soon as it is all gone!
Debra Witt
March 14, 2013 @ 10:09 am
Great topic! When we recently moved we actually received a refund from the moving company–we’d gotten rid of so much stuff that we came in under the estimated weight. (Yard sale, at least five trips to Salvation Army, plus an 18-foot dumpster filled to the brim.) It felt so great and has turned me into a purging queen. It’s tough staying on top of the paper clutter, but it’s so nice to know that I have a pretty streamlined house now.
Lisa Marie Hart
March 14, 2013 @ 12:19 pm
Nice going, Denise. I join you in this movement and have long been a fan of Graham Hill’s. I even get his daily LifeEdited.com newsletter–one of the few “stuffs” I actually allow in my inbox.
Small spaces have always been some of my favorite places, likely from growing up in a small bedroom that I never minded. My tiny Brooklyn apartment, pint-sized restaurants, attic B&B rooms, petite boutiques, my bathroom senior year in college with a sloping ceiling over the clawfoot tub–having all you need in one small space always appealed to me. I never wanted a house, in fact, but somehow ended up in one. Now we are planning to downsize from 4 bedrooms to a 520 sq ft condo as soon as we are able. It will be liberating to dump the accumulation and ditch the excess, and we are starting right now, every weekend. Yes Denise, less is best!
We should all have invested in the storage unit companies a long time ago… While this is a growing movement, many will never catch on.
Denise Schipani
March 15, 2013 @ 3:37 pm
Oh, Lisa Marie! Thanks for chiming in! I love the idea of very small spaces that are very efficiently used, which is how i remember your lovely little Brooklyn apartment.
Denise
Sarah
March 14, 2013 @ 6:30 pm
It’s just such a vicious cycle – the more crap you have the more space you think you need….and the more space you get the more you fill it up.
I also apply it to vehicles – I’ve been resisting the minivan my husband so desperately wants us to have because I just see us filling it up – we’ll go on our annual camping trip and load up a tonne more stuff that we don’t need just because we can! Funny how my parents managed to cart my brother and I around in a two door Plymouth Reliant ( such a classic ) and yet today its nothing bu enormous minivans and SUVs on the road.
I’m holding out in my Honda Accord so far….
Briana
March 14, 2013 @ 10:05 pm
Families do collect a lot of stuff, but I think the feeling of drowning in stuff also has to do with the way houses are built these days.
When we looked for our first home a year and a half ago, I found that the space in newer homes is so wasted. Their so called “two” car garages can barely hold one vehicle and two boxes. The bedrooms were tiny. All the space was used up in the master bathrooms and closets the size of a New York apartment.
We purposely bought a house that was built mid-century because the proportions suited us better. The garage holds two cars, a work bench, a big storage closet and more, and the bedrooms are just the right size. The master bath is small but it’s fine. The closets hold a middle class wardrobe, not a pop star’s.
We’re happy with our 1500 sq ft house, but if we had bought the same size house built in the last decade I’m pretty sure I would eventually find myself pondering where to store my son’s bike as I brushed my teeth in my own personal sink.
Denise Schipani
March 15, 2013 @ 3:36 pm
So true about newer homes! At least, the ones I see on House Hunters (who, me, obsessed? Ahem). I see these 3,000 square foot “new builds” (and often, tellingly, they are empty/foreclosures) that have soaring ceilings in a giant great-room-kitchen-living combo,which has its appeal, I guess, but then the other rooms seem skimpy. It’s like the priorities are wacky, when there’s a closet that’s the size of my son’s room right now (bigger, actually; both my boys’ rooms are like cells!), but somehow nothing that says comfy-cozy anyplace in the house.
And WHO is really using the giant tubs?
Denise
Margaret
March 15, 2013 @ 1:22 pm
Thanks for always having a finger on the pulse, Denise. Last time it was snacking, now it is house size. Just the other day I was chatting with two other moms who are also house-hunting. I mentioned that our fantasy is a nice ranch house that we can grow old in. (We have two girls – 1 and 3 years old) One of the other moms said, “wow, that’s so great that you want to make that work… a house that’s big enough for the four of you now and that won’t be too big when it’s just two of you.) She said she was looking for a house that had an extra space – attic/basement/playroom so that they would be the place where all their kids’ friends would hang out.
Like you, Denise, I reflect on the 4 bedroom suburban colonial where I grew up. I recall frequent gatherings of large groups of teenagers at my house. We did not have any extra play space. We used the kitchen, the dining room and the living room. My parents helped me provide lots of food and they floated in and out, chatting with my friends.
And what a great point about families getting smaller and houses getting bigger! Thanks for the reminder to come back to the values that my husband and I set for ourselves. We are freshly committed to living in a smaller space, keeping clutter to a minimum, and making gatherings all about the people and not about how nice our house is.
Jen in MN
March 15, 2013 @ 3:21 pm
I love this topic. It’s especially near & dear to my heart right now, as we have our 2200 sq ft, 1947-issue house on the market. Our family of four will be moving cross country once it sells, and certainly living in a much smaller space for at least a year (a 3 bedroom apartment or house if we’re lucky; maybe even 2 bed). I’m kind of relieved at the idea of living smaller for a bit.
Recent feedback from a house showing said our house was “small” for the money. Excuse me while I wonder when 2200 sq ft became SMALL?! It baffles me. Truly baffles me.
While I’d love a more-modern layout, and will hopefully buy newer next time, I really don’t want much more than 2000ish sq ft. That’s enough for a family of 4, frankly. And I don’t want to clean or maintain any more than that!
I do not get the huge-house obsession.
Melina Merlin
March 16, 2013 @ 2:04 pm
Hello! We are Americans living on a narrowboat in England. Two adults and two boys (7 & 5) with a boat 6 feet wide and 70 feet long. We have done the ultimate downsize! And yet every week I can go through and clear out a bit more here and there! Need a book? Here is your library card. Left that toy on the floor for two days? It was delivered to the charity shop. The funny thing is, the kitchen is bigger than the one I had in our flat in Fulham (london)! It can be a strain, but owning our home and living a debt-free life makes it all worth it, every. single. day.
Alexandra
March 21, 2013 @ 1:37 pm
I didn’t really like that NYT piece because I thought it reeked of what I think of as “conspicuous non-consumption.” The reality is, after a certain point, it takes money and time to live with very little. A family with three or four kids, living on a middle-class salary, will need room to store bins of old clothing to re-use as hand-me-downs, or a true pantry, etc. They will benefit from buying the bulk pack of toilet paper and having a tall low shelf to hide it on. etc.
That said, I am a huge proponent of living as small as is reasonable for you. I live in a 400sf apartment and it fits everything I need (I have set up storage for precisely three spare rolls of TP). For now. When my life changes, I will need more space – for the kids’ stuff, for other people’s clothing, etc. But I always want to choose my space and my stuff carefully. I don’t want to spend my life cleaning or caring for or paying to essentially store a bunch of stuff, in closets and garages. My goal in a living space is always for it to be big enough to hold everything I love, and small enough to have little room for anything else.
edj
March 25, 2013 @ 9:35 pm
Oh I LOVE this post, Denise! (I know I’m late with this…behind on my blogs) We lived in Mauritania for 6 years and it completely changed my attitude towards stuff, esp when we got rid of some stuff and doubled the amount of stuff owned by a family living outside. We keep the amount down as much as possible, but compared to the rest of the world, we are pack rats.
Here’s a post I wrote about it, if you’re interested: http://planetnomad.wordpress.com/2007/07/17/stuff/
Chris Gunn
March 27, 2013 @ 12:58 pm
You should check out the book 7 (Seven) by Jen Hatmaker. It talks a lot about slimming down and “purging” your stuff. It’s a great read, and my wife went crazy with it.
Jmch
March 27, 2013 @ 11:48 pm
Love these comments. We are currently caught in this cycle. We live in a 2000 ft sq ranch that is just v v poorly planned out due to an extension here and another there. Not by us. We have enough space for our family of 4 but I would LoVE a closet in my bedroom (I have one of those standing armoires) and a mud room. I would also like that when people are in our kitchen, they can not see into my sons bedroom. But we can not find a ‘new’ house in a reasonable size. In our town anything new is 3500+ sq ft. Crazy. We don’t really want to move town. This is a real problem for us. Keeping our values but being comfortable in our home.