Holiday TV Special Redux: Why “Rudolph” Would Never Be Made Today
Just this morning, I was reading an excellent op-ed in Newsday, the Long Island, New York newspaper. A writer friend of mine, Claudia Copquin, wrote about Rudolph. I’ll put the link here for those of you who may be Newsday subscribers or Optimum Online customers (which you have to be, dang it, to get access), but for the rest of you, here’s the gist: A professor at a local university came out with a self-published e-book called “No More Bullies at the North Pole,” contending that all the adult figures in the 1964 holiday classic Rudolph the Red-Nosed Reindeer are guilty of such poor behavior and example-setting that, I presume, we should shield our kids from it.
Claudia writes that the professor, George Giuliani of CW Post College, feels that the Rudolph story…
…promotes bullying. He also points to incidents of sexism, favoritism, exclusion and hypocritical behavior in the holiday classic.
That Rudolph, with his nose so bright, becomes a hero by leading Santa’s reindeer on a foggy night is no matter to Professor George Giuliani, who claims that this isn’t a cute little story. The rampant use of the word “misfit” aimed at Rudolph sends the wrong message to vulnerable children.
And heaven forbid we ever, ever send the wrong message to children. So as I was telling Claudia in a Facebook comment, a lightbulb went off when I read her wonderful op-ed. Didn’t I write about this very subject, right here, last year? So off I went to check,and as it turns out, I did. But it was two years ago.
In the spirit of the holiday, I’m re-gifting my December, 2009 post: Enjoy!
Rudolph and His Dad: Why Donner Would Never Be Allowed to Call His Son a Misfit Today
(originally posted here, December 8, 2009)
The other day, on impulse at the supermarket, I picked up the DVD of “Rudolph the Red-Nosed Reindeer” for the boys. They hadn’t seen it yet, even though it’s been on TV. Both of them are rehearsing holiday songs for their school concerts, so it’s been a nonstop chorus of Rudolph over here, and I figured it was better to own the dang thing than to sit through commercials.
So we watched. And while James tucked his head under a blanket whenever the Bumble came on the screen, and Daniel laughed over my favorite character, Yukon Cornelius, I was taken back in time to the 70s, remembering watching with my sister on the oval braided rug in the den (small time-travel aside here: did others of you raised in the 1970s do all your TV-watching on the floor/rug, rather than the couch? Did the couch in your house, as in mine, have an “adults only” vibe? Weird).
The story is full of you’d-never-see-that-on-TV-today oddities. And I’m not talking about laughable “special effects” or the way the characters’ mouth movements never match their dialog. I’m talking about a reindeer father who is awfully mean to his misfit, red-nosed son, entreating him to hide his differences and fit in. Then what does the dad do, when he realizes his shunned and ridiculed child has run off? He mans up and goes after him, telling his anxious wife to stay in the cave, not for the sensible reason that Rudolph might come back, but because going out in the storm to search is “man’s work.”
Then there’s poor Hermey, the misfit elf who wants to be a dentist. His stand-in father is the head elf, who rages at his “son” who wants to be anything other than what he’s supposed to be. He, too, apologizes in the end and lets Hermey set up a North Pole dental practice, but his original sin — fatherly non-acceptance — is one that you’d never see in kids’ fictional fare today.
Last night, I was on the phone with my sister, and we talked about the show. I said, “If that were made today, the message would be ‘celebrate your differences,’ not, ‘shun the misfits.’ ” And sure, that’s eventually the lesson that’s learned in Rudolph, but the key difference is that before Rudolph can realize his oddity makes him special, he first has to be disparaged and cast out, not just by his peers, but by his own father. In the end, forgiveness is instant. And you get the idea that no one needs therapy.
Did we just miss that part as kids? No, we really didn’t, as my sister pointed out. “We knew the father, and even Santa, was mean to Rudolph,” she said. And we pretty much thought, ‘well, that’s the way it is.’ ” And then we got on with our day.
Today, however, that show wouldn’t be made because we couldn’t stand the idea of our kids being shown a less-than-ideal parent while they were watching a TV show or movie. Sure, we’ll allow them to be temporarily frightened when the Bumble roars or, King Kong-like, grasps a struggling doe in his giant paw. We can allow them the temporary anxiety of wondering if Yukon makes it out alive, or if Christmas will be canceled like a flight out of O’Hare. Scary is acceptable.
What’s not acceptable any longer are adults who get it wrong, then apologize in the end, as Donner does to Rudolph after he saves Christmas. TV and movie parents don’t screw up. They make cookies and laugh indulgently and otherwise remain more or less benignly in the background as their kids (whether they’re reindeer, pigs, turtles or little bears) mess up, make messes, and sometimes learn lessons. But they’d never, ever, ever call their child a misfit. Even if they said they were sorry.
Back in the 70s, on that braided rug, safe in the paneled walls of our den, with our parents behind us on the couch, my sister and I watched, got scared, then felt good again, and my folks didn’t give a second thought to the negative depiction of parenthood in this once-yearly bit of holiday fun. They just yawned and sent us to off to bed.
Why do we seem to believe, as my sister pointed out, that our kids can’t comprehend and mentally manage the fact that sometimes parents aren’t perfectly nice, that they mess up and apologize, sometimes over and over for the same crimes? Why don’t we give them that credit? Why, instead do we give them entertainment that whitewashes parents into mistake-free creations that the kids run roughshod over?
Back then, Donner could apologize with a manly clanking of his antlers. Today, he’d be getting a visit from the Department of Children’s Services. Or, more likely, he’d have started out being the kind of dad who gave his misfit son a sentimental lecture on how that red nose made Rudolph special.
Apparently, fictional parents are no longer allowed to bumble their way to the right thing. They have to be perfect from the get-go.
What do you think?
Jennifer Fink
December 21, 2011 @ 5:08 pm
Every year I watch Rudolph, and every year, I’m taken somewhat aback by what was once OK to include in a kids’ show. But I agree: I certainly wasn’t harmed watching it when I grew up. And your line, “we couldn’t stand the idea of our kids being shown a less-than-ideal parent while they were watching a TV show or movie” brings up a really, really important point, I think.
No wonder we as parents are so hard on ourselves! No wonder our kids expect perfection from us! That’s almost all we see today.
Come to think of it, that’s why I liked it when my kids watched that horribly-named show, Wife Swap. At least they got to see that other moms were crazier/meaner/not as understanding as theirs.
SusanP
December 22, 2011 @ 10:43 am
I’ve had lots of these moments this month as we’ve watched more of these shows this year.
Another shocker is “A Charlie Brown Christmas” — look at all the bullying going on there! I just read a blog talking about this show yesterday but sadly can’t remember which one.
We watched Home Alone last weekend and I could not believe the exchanges between the mother and Kevin at the beginning when she banishes him to the attic!! Holy Cow! Or how the Uncle treats him. No wonder he wanted them to disappear. That movie is not that old, so it’s really an eye opener how really it’s in the last 10 years or so that things have changed.
I haven’t watched it recently yet but I know A Christmas Story is chuck full of bullying, dares, fights, and non perfect parenting.
Oh and yes, we always had to watch tv on the floor as kids. This was when we didn’t have cable or remote controls. We WERE the remote controls so I guess it helped being on the floor near the tv.
Ron S. Doyle
January 9, 2012 @ 3:39 pm
I dunno. For every over-the-top portrayal of the perfect parent, there’s one of a bad parent. Cue the Homer Simpson clips…
Regarding the rug situation—we didn’t have the rug, we didn’t have an adults-only couch, but we did sit on the floor. Why? The TV was low to the ground, entombed in its dark-stained wood console. Sitting on the floor gave you the best line of sight. And the floor gave us a head start of a few feet, so we could always reach the twist knob before my father. 😉