Baby Lust (And How It Clashes With Mean Mommyhood)
If I were as mean a mommy as I profess, if I were so hooked on schedules and eager to turn my little babies into independent boys-to-men, if I so valued my me-time and my work ethic, then I wouldn’t want a third child quite so badly, would I?
But I do.
And I’m not going to have one. The reasons not to range from the silly to the sublime. Here they are, in no particular order:
- I’m 43 years old. I don’t think that’s too old to have a baby. And in fact, my instinct, my health, and my family history indicate that I’m likely as fertile now as I was at 36 when I had Daniel. But I remember the difference in how I felt pregnant at 36, and pregnant again a mere two years later. I’m not equipped any longer for that level of wrecked.
- I already had two C-sections, and (though I don’t want to gross you out with the details), let’s just say that I can feel the ridge of scar tissue under the surface scar, and I don’t like to think about what a third surgery would do to it. I tried like hell not to have the second, but ended up going under the knife again, and I’m not sure I have the energy to find the one health professional out there who’d risk letting a 43-year-old double-section-gal labor.
- We happen to have health insurance right now (not a given in our lives, or in this country as it stands), but it’s not terrific insurance. We had “good” insurance when I had James and that STILL cost us $6,000 out of pocket. I mean, he’s worth every penny, but still…
- We have small cars. (I said some reasons were silly, right?) With a third, I’d need another row of seats, and I’d have to be dragged kicking and screaming to do so. Plus, we can’t really afford a new car right now.
- I’m freelance. I don’t have the luxury of maternity leave (and I use the word “luxury” with a heavy coat of irony, seeing as how 12 weeks of mostly unpaid leave is more barbaric than luxurious). I’d have to do what I did when I had James; resume my work within weeks. (Typical conversation with editor back then: “Is that your baby crying? Do you have to get him?” “No, he’s fine. It’s fine.”) While I may fantasize about the idea of sending my two older boys off to school while I bond with the new little one, letting him nurse while I write, I know it wouldn’t really be that way, and one or both of us would likely be crying a lot.
- And even more selfish/economic reasons: I finally stopped paying for childcare now that James is going to kindergarten. I don’t want to buy any more cases of Costco diapers and wipes. Thing is, and this really sticks in my craw, we can “afford” another child in the long term, but not so much in the short term.
I’m smart enough to make the totally obvious connection between this surge of baby lust and what’s going on in my family right now: a mini-babyboom has expanded our extended group by two new babies in the last three months — and there’s another one on the way this fall.
Yesterday, I visited the newest, my one-week-old, first-cousin-once-removed, Martin:
Also in attendance was my second-newest first-cousin-once-removed, three-month-old Robert:
Martin’s tiny size (it was like cradling a sleeping kitten, or a roasted chicken; he barely breaks 6 pounds) made holding him surreal, because my babies started out bigger than this. He never opened his eyes while I held him, and the usual chaos of a baby visit at an already child- and baby-centric houseĀ swirled around us. (Aside from me and my two boys, there were Martin, his parents, and his three big sisters; my other cousin, her husband and the toddler and preschooler they have in addition to Robert; my sister and her youngest daughter; my mom; my aunt and uncle; two au pairs; and two elderly poodles.)
Later, I held baby Robert, the three-month-old, who at 18 lbs. triggered a trip down memory lane, reminding me how it felt to heft my Daniel at that age, when he was all rolls of fat and drooling, toothless grin.
When the head-spinning nature of a few hours in that cacaphonous company died down, sometime last night, in the silence that was left, I felt an ache so strong I started crying on the couch. It wasn’t because I wanted another baby, though that’s part of it — the elemental urge that any woman who’s smelled the sweet head of her own newborns recognizes. It was because I knew I couldn’t, and wouldn’t.
When I had my newborns, I wasn’t blissful. I couldn’t let myself drown in their weirdness and their newness and their bottomless needs. I loved them, but I mostly survived them. (I wrote about this once, in an essay for American Baby called “The Big Lie.”) It’s only in the remembering, such as when I pulled out the black and white marble notebook I used for Daniel’s baby book (I was doublechecking that he was indeed as chunked out as cousin Robert at 3 months), that I realize how fascinated I was by my babies’ growth, their discoveries, their antics.
But I can’t go through the non-blissful part again — for the reasons of age and of exhaustion, of finances and self-hood — just for the smell of a new baby’s head, or just for the times I watched a 6-month-old figure out how to get across a room on his belly, or an 11-month-old work out how to take a step, or decide which of the two toys he has clutched in his fat fists he wants to drop in order to pick up a third.
I recognized that dull look of fear, pain, and exhaustion in my cousin’s eyes, baby Martin’s mom. Did I mention she already has three children, daughters who are 10, 8, and 5? Did I mention that she’s 42 years old? Did I mention that I’m probably one of the few people close to her who’s willing to agree with her that it sucks, to agree with her that while the baby himself is beautiful and perfect and a miracle, that meeting his needs means putting off her own, again?
Being that only person — the person who can ooh and ahh with the rest of them and breathe in the baby smell with the best of them, but who can still feel the dread and the fear — is part of my “mean” mommyhood. The practicality gets me, every time. It’s my mommy-burden, knowing precisely what my limits are.
And apparently, finally, really, my limit is two.
debbie
September 4, 2009 @ 1:45 pm
Thank you so much for writing this post. It’s pretty much exactly where I am wrt another kid–right down to being 43 years old and a freelance writer. I feel like I should print this out & carry it around to show people when they question our decision to stop at one.
Denise
September 4, 2009 @ 3:49 pm
Debbie,
thanks. And listen, I see you blogrolled me — I’ll do the same. Though I have to say, foodie blogs always make me feel bad for not being more adventurous with my cooking!
Karen Bannan
September 4, 2009 @ 2:05 pm
Really beautiful. Really beautiful.
Sally Cannon
September 4, 2009 @ 3:32 pm
2 is a good number. You don’t want the kids outnumbering the adults in the household. Stick it at 2.
Lisa
September 4, 2009 @ 8:50 pm
I agree. I agree. I agree.
But.
I still want another one. I sent my little one to school today for the first time and I really miss them all so much.
Thank you for writing this post, even though I still want another one even with all that stuff rolled up in it.
Cat
September 4, 2009 @ 9:42 pm
Great post. I especially like how you mention “surviving” the newborn stage. I didn’t really enjoy my son until he hit 6 months and started interacting. Until then, he was a cute little ball of need and that’s about it.
Chris Le Beau
September 5, 2009 @ 3:30 pm
Nice, Denise. I actually loved the newborn stage. It was exhausting, yes, and everything you say is true, but something in me calmed down during that time and just let go. I’d probably be a better person today if I’d hung on to some of that mellow as my daughter got older. Still, whenever we contemplate another (and we’ve been doing so on and off for a good year), I settle right back where you are — the emotional always gets edged out by the practical. So many people say “oh, it’s never a good time… you just have to jump in… no one would have more kids if they actually thought too much about it… yada yada.” But I think that’s put into practice far too often and contributes to an awful lot of regret and resentment among parents, and that of course affects the kids as well. My daughter enters full-day kindergarten this fall, so I know it’s likely I’ll play the what-if game yet again, but for now I like where we’re at.
Alida
September 8, 2009 @ 8:42 pm
First, let me say what a young 43 you are. Seriously had you not written the caption I would’ve thought that was the babies 20 something momma. This is beautifully written. I had my babies at 36 and 37. Two was all I could do. I think I’m a better mom than if I had had them in my 20’s. I was too hard headed then, not as relaxed. I know my limits, physically, financial, emotional and otherwise. I don’t even get the urge to hold new babies. I view them with curiousity and awe, but I’m really done with the whole baby business.
Denise
September 8, 2009 @ 8:48 pm
Alida,
Flattery will get you everywhere! I hear you on feeling more ready to be a mom at our “advanced” age, but I also wouldn’t mind having more time on the clock, in case! My mom had my sister and me at 20 and 23, which she readily says was too young. She then waited another 7 1/2 yrs after me and had my brother at 31. That still seems young to me, but she calls it when she was “ready to have a child.” She’s a woman who knows her limits; she had the luxury of having a third after her first two were older and more independent.
thanks for the comment, and keep reading,
Denise
Gretchen
September 9, 2009 @ 1:56 pm
So I’m a decade younger than you, but I’m in the same situation: just shuttled my kids off to school, don’t want to fork out the money for a new kid, life is good right now so why upset the balance…and yet I’m in the midst of baby fever because a friend just had a little one and I can’t get enough of him. I was earlier than my friends and they’re all having first and second babies, and I’m done. I feel sad about it sometimes, and conflicted. But my sister, who has four kids, says you never stop wondering when a baby should be your last.
Sarah E. Ludwig
September 9, 2009 @ 10:53 pm
Denise, I’ve posted about this whole baby fever/lust thing too much lately! I’m SO having baby lust and now that my youngest sister just had a baby, it’s really bad. As in, I’ll drive miles to go see him to get my baby fix. <>
But I’m done too. Already have four, which is plenty, and now they’re all in school, so I have even more time to dedicate to my freelance writing business. It’s just not in the cards for me. Oh, plus I’m not even married anymore, another small factor. =)
It doesn’t stop me from wanting one though! Though everything in my life points to the ridiculousness of even wanting it, I can’t seem to help myself.
I think some of us are just born to suffer from this affliction called baby lust. Maybe grandchildren will help? I sure hope so.
MarthaandMe
September 10, 2009 @ 5:10 pm
I tried for a third for a while, but we came to the same conclusions you did. It was just too hard. I would have had to give up my office for a nursery. But I still lust for babies. Sometimes I think maybe I should volunteer at the hospital so I could hold NICU babies. Mostly though I think I’ll just wait for grandchildren (my oldest is 17 and sometimes I can kid myself and say I might have grandkids in 8 years).
Meredith Resnick
September 11, 2009 @ 10:51 pm
Such thoughtfulness in this post. And honesty. And reason. I just love that.
Beth
September 12, 2009 @ 9:28 am
This was a wonderful post! We have three kids and I am thinking that I would like a fourth (haha – my baby is only 9 months old)! But we are done…
I am visiting from Michelle’s My Semblence of Sanity and I’ll be back to visit again!
Elizabeth
September 12, 2009 @ 11:41 am
Love it! I’m 41 with a 4.5yr old son. I didn’t have the pregnancy option since I’m infertile (2 yrs failed IUI/IVF) so we adopted our son as a newborn. We were there when he was born & brought him home the next day. I have to admit I thought I was the only Mom who thinks the first 6-8 weeks stink on ice! I would love another but know it won’t happen. Too much money, too old, too stressful to go through the process again!
Loren
September 12, 2009 @ 3:20 pm
It’s not always about reason. I bargained for a year for the third, including such arguments as “people in real poverty have kids. It’s a matter of how you define ‘affordable.'” But the winning point was that I thought I would deeply regret not having a third, and then it would be too late, and yet I knew I would never regret having one more to love. At 39, with two girls, ages 5 and 9 at the time, I had “the boy,” and I cannot imagine our family without him. He is the little prince and is doted on by all. I’m now 44 — last year I started feeling sad to see the baby grow up — he’s 5 now — and asked my husband if maybe we should try for one more… and laughed his ass off! Yeah, we’re done.
Denise
September 12, 2009 @ 3:42 pm
No,you’re right Loren, it’s not always about reason. And there’s a part of me that will probably always regret not having a third, especially if I could have had a daughter. But it is what it is…
Meagan Francis
September 12, 2009 @ 3:32 pm
The thing is, Denise? Let’s say you’d decided to have another…there’s still no guarantee you’d ever feel “done” after that. At age 32, with five kids and a freelance career of my own, I’ve finally realized this is a decision I have to make with my head, not my heart. My family history suggests I could go on having babies every two or three years until I’m in my mid-forties, and yes, I’d love them all and I think I’d do a good job at parenting them. For me, it’s not so much the number as the investment of time. I’ve been raising children for twelve years now, putting the bulk of my energy and money and time into that. At some point, I’d like to move on. I love having a big family and am so glad I had them all. At the same time, the newborn phase is so fleeting, I almost felt cheated this last time around. I went through nine months of pregnancy, another labor and birth, and postpartum recovery for something that was over in the blink of an eye?
Meagan Francis
September 12, 2009 @ 3:32 pm
That rather disjointed comment of mine was meant to agree and empathize with you, by the way. I just re-read it and I think I sound like I’m arguing, even though I’m not. As you can tell, this is a topic I’m personally conflicted about.
Judy N
September 13, 2009 @ 8:26 pm
Great blog. If I had known how much I would love being a Mother, I would have started earlier, and tried for a 2nd. My 13 year old claims he’s tall enough to count as 2 kids, and he’s a wonderful son, so I am very very fortunate to have my 1 large enough for 2 , and have no regrets, only happiness.
LA
September 13, 2009 @ 10:10 pm
Hi. Linked through from a NYT article. Glad I did.
At 46 I know for certain I’m all finished making babies. My elder son is 24 and the younger is 12. When the elder son was 12 we said, “It’s now or never for another.” We did it and having two ‘only’ children has been wild. Now older and much, much tired-er I couldn’t possibly see starting over again, but do understand that burst of longing. Fortunately for me that longing is neatly assuaged by a trip to the grocery and watching a mom with little ones trying to do her shopping. It all comes back- the exhaustion, the frustration, the juggling…um, yeah. We’re all good on the baby thing here. ~LA
nappyvalleygirl
September 14, 2009 @ 1:14 pm
Excellent post – mirrors many of my feelings about having a third. I’m a British freelance journalist and blogger, recently moved to Long Island – was very interested to find your blog after reading about you in the NY Times.
Marcy
September 14, 2009 @ 1:15 pm
I was a mostly miserable pregnant woman, a barely coherent mother of a newborn (recovering from an unplanned, not-quite-right C-section), and then a straight-back-to-work mom, all by necessity of course. The Army, my bread and butter at the time, was not the most accomodating environs for any of those mommy-life stages. And now my husband and I are supposed to have another kid, because wouldn’t it be cruel to try to raise our wonderful, terrific, almost completely perfect in every way son without the benefit of a brother or sister. Honestly, if someone plopped a 6-year old clone of our son into our family I would be thrilled, but that’s not really how it works is it. So I think, at least for now and probably forever, one almost completely perfect in every way son will be enough for this very mean (and deleriously happy!) mommy.
Briefly Noted: 3 other blogs in the LeapFrog Tag Reading System giveaway «
September 23, 2009 @ 12:10 am
[…] read it, doesn’t it? Denise Schipani, Mean Mommy extraordinaire, blogs about everything from baby lust to why she didn’t childproof. On her “Why ‘Mean Mommy?’” page, Denise […]
Christina Baglivi Tinglof
September 29, 2009 @ 8:03 pm
I, too, have felt “baby lust,” and I’m a bit older! And then one day my sister was visiting with her 6-month-old (she had her at age 47, BTW). We were sitting by the pool–I was reading, my sister was entertaining her baby–but then my sister needed to go inside for a moment. Naturally, she handed the baby to me. I bounced my niece for awhile and made faces, but after about 5 minutes, I began looking around. “Where’s your mother?” Then my niece began to fuss. I began to get ansty. Finally, my sister returned and I gave the baby back to her. When she walked inside, I turned to my husband, “Wow! I’m so over that part of my life!” I realized that I could actually read a magazine while my kids played in the pool. Nice.
Lisa T.
November 18, 2009 @ 2:49 pm
I don’t think you ever lose that baby lust no matter how many you have. Newborns are just so delectable. I just had my third and last (2 mo. ago) and I fear the end of each day as it’s one more day that she’s grown away from infancy. Since I already had two other children and experienced the newborn stage as a blur of exhaustion, colick and self doubt of what to do, this time I find myself holding on for dear life in an effort not to miss out again! But I am sure that in retrospect I’ll still feel that I didn’t embrace every single moment as I could have because in the reality life how can we?
Confessions of a Mean Mommy » Blog Archive » When it Comes to Babycare, What Happened to Instinct?
January 12, 2010 @ 1:02 pm
[…] I have a brand-new nephew, Nicholas (Nico, for short). His parents, my brother and sister-in-law, are mostly going minimal when it comes to baby gear. Part of that is a space issue–their house isĀ pretty compact. But a bigger part of it is that, from what I can tell, and not including having read probably four million books on pregnancy, birth, and babycare (they approach most things fairly intellectually), they plan to rely largely on instinct. (And by the way, the photo above is not little Nico, but stay tuned to the end of this post for a gratuitous, isn’t-he-the-cutest photo of the latest member of my rapidly expanding family). […]
Confessions of a Mean Mommy » Blog Archive » A(nother) Farewell to the Daughter I’ll Never Have
March 5, 2010 @ 12:54 pm
[…] fact, they’ve intensified. As I’ve written here, we’ve had a baby boom in the family, and it’s not gone unnoticed by my boys. When I had James, Daniel was not quite two; bringing […]
Confessions of a Mean Mommy » Blog Archive » Why Good Parenting is Less Work Than You Think
June 23, 2010 @ 2:22 pm
[…] don’t have a big family; for better or worse, my two kids are enough for me. But one of the arguments people make against breeding beyond two (or maybe three) offspring is that […]